Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1402272
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix |
| Date | 2016-05-17 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rzKqe-3kb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rzs0h-8f4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzwZY-3eP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzJaT-2C9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzJNv-2Rf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May, at 10:04:34AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> >
> > Now I'm wondering whether other users of FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END make
> > this same mistake. Coccinelle might be able to detect it perhaps.
>
> A quick bit of sed turned up the code in arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S,
> which looks to suffer from the same bug,
That would be arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S, but yeah, good find!
> /* rdi: arg1 ... normal C conventions. rax is saved/restored. */
> .macro THUNK name, func, put_ret_addr_in_rdi=0
> .globl \name
> .type \name, @function
> \name:
> FRAME_BEGIN
>
> /* this one pushes 9 elems, the next one would be %rIP */
> pushq %rdi
> pushq %rsi
> pushq %rdx
> pushq %rcx
> pushq %rax
> pushq %r8
> pushq %r9
> pushq %r10
> pushq %r11
>
> .if \put_ret_addr_in_rdi
> /* 9*8(%rsp) is return addr on stack */
> movq 9*8(%rsp), %rdi
> .endif
>
> With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y 9*8(%rsp) is actually the value of %rbp on
> entry, not the return address.
This seems to affect:
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
THUNK trace_hardirqs_on_thunk,trace_hardirqs_on_caller,1
THUNK trace_hardirqs_off_thunk,trace_hardirqs_off_caller,1
#endif
and with TRACE_IRQFLAGS we already in most times force frame pointers, such as
when LOCKDEP is enabled:
config LOCKDEP
bool
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
...
select FRAME_POINTER if !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM_UNWIND && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !SCORE
Also, unlike the efi_call() case, this thunk_64.S bug affects the quality of
debug/tracing information, not runtime correctness per se.
still all that is by accident, not by design - this bug should be fixed too.
Thanks,
Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[GIT PULL] EFI fix Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-16 16:50 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-16 22:10 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-05-16 22:30 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> - 2016-05-17 00:50 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s tip-bot for Linus Torvalds <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-05-17 08:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-17 11:10 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-17 11:50 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-17 12:30 +0200
[PATCH] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-17 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-17 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-05-17 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-17 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-17 19:30 +0200
[PATCH v2] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-17 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-17 20:40 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry/64: Fix stack return address retrieval in thunk tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-05-19 11:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-23 14:10 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-23 14:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-24 11:10 +0200
csiph-web