Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1400932

Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.

From Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.
Date 2016-05-13 20:30 +0200
Message-ID <ryq0y-Ax-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rtLS1-7cr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtSgO-3WZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ryoBs-7qC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ryq0y-Ax-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Candela Technologies

Show all headers | View raw


On 05/13/2016 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700
>
>> How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
>> request the old veth behaviour?
>
> I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work upstream on and
> maintain these components, since it is an area I am not so familiar
> with.
>
> Generally speaking asking me directly for opinions on matters like
> this isn't the way to go, in fact I kind of find it irritating.  It
> can't all be on me.
>

Fair enough, thanks for your time.

Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so  treats packets with bad checksums as good. Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> - 2016-05-13 19:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so  treats packets with bad checksums as good. David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-05-13 20:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so  treats packets with bad checksums as good. Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> - 2016-05-13 20:30 +0200

csiph-web