Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1400540
| From | Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: powerpc: Discard ffs() function and use builtin_ffs instead |
| Date | 2016-05-13 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ryfeO-6kr-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ryeC5-5YC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 13/05/2016 à 08:16, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> On Thu, 2016-12-05 at 15:32:22 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> With the ffs() function as defined in arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
>> GCC will not optimise the code in case of constant parameter, as shown
>> by the small exemple below.
>>
>> int ffs_test(void)
>> {
>> return 4 << ffs(31);
>> }
>>
>> c0012334 <ffs_test>:
>> c0012334: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1
>> c0012338: 38 60 00 04 li r3,4
>> c001233c: 7d 29 00 34 cntlzw r9,r9
>> c0012340: 21 29 00 20 subfic r9,r9,32
>> c0012344: 7c 63 48 30 slw r3,r3,r9
>> c0012348: 4e 80 00 20 blr
>>
>> With this patch, the same function will compile as follows:
>>
>> c0012334 <ffs_test>:
>> c0012334: 38 60 00 08 li r3,8
>> c0012338: 4e 80 00 20 blr
>
> But what code does it generate when it's not a constant?
The generated code is the same with and without the patch when not a
constant:
int ffs_test2(int x)
{
return ffs(x);
}
c001233c <ffs_test2>:
c001233c: 7d 23 00 d0 neg r9,r3
c0012340: 7d 23 18 38 and r3,r9,r3
c0012344: 7c 63 00 34 cntlzw r3,r3
c0012348: 20 63 00 20 subfic r3,r3,32
c001234c: 4e 80 00 20 blr
>
> And which gcc version first added the builtin version?
Don't know, but __builtin_ffs() is already used in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_32.h
Christophe
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] powerpc: Discard ffs() function and use builtin_ffs instead Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-05-12 17:40 +0200
Re: powerpc: Discard ffs() function and use builtin_ffs instead Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-05-13 08:20 +0200
Re: powerpc: Discard ffs() function and use builtin_ffs instead Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-05-13 09:00 +0200
Re: powerpc: Discard ffs() function and use builtin_ffs instead Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es> - 2016-05-13 11:10 +0200
csiph-web