Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1401120
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: dlopen() and ELF alternatives |
| Date | 2016-05-14 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ryLy2-50o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ryKVk-49j-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 11:41:54AM -0500, Chad Brewbaker wrote: > In 2016 we are still relying on flat file databases to store binaries. This is not a discussion club; cut the rethorics if you want to be taken seriously. You sound as if the only problem you have is that format is insufficiently buzzword-compliant; if that's the case, nobody is going to give a damn, obviously. If you *do* have more specific problem, have a courtesy to describe it... > I am looking for prior attempts at alternative interfaces to dlopen(), and > alternative formats for object files. There had been a plenty of object file formats; take a look at libbfd for a sample of that panopticum.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dlopen() and ELF alternatives Chad Brewbaker <crb002@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 18:50 +0200 Re: dlopen() and ELF alternatives Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-05-14 19:30 +0200
csiph-web