Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1399616
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/arch_prctl/64: restore accidentally removed put_cpu in ARCH_SET_GS |
| Date | Thu, 12 May 2016 02:10:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxMmt-2gq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rxmV4-1JH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxmV4-1JH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxJ5g-7qx-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amacapital-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZSSSAt/2/c8pDI5gvizyEOUs6fxZlzyyZawjYFA+2vE=; b=LdamCZA/jQyDnEZVMHwojQQ++c1zvPuU18V5ZjWxXOIn/2T9oQ74gmCJvbSL9TLjqv bmQt/EMi8w0lnqrymeqNdGh0p84KYxjNfgbHIQL2JX+PmXfREpnLvzfFJwfh+bd+AeyE oOa+WG9d4/BFRQD31Nmk4xyMqPWB8w2hE63XrrdZNgkyX5GfHhsH1zsfHT+JALU052CZ YGoYHuzZHSgMW2Q4Bme6T70JqITR5P07AXiLqEoRCD3fooJSKWHQM0r6e65CG4h9oJZ/ D0TkUSrDj9pPwpZ3xAlZP3gfAFdcXnYrBIyqmPsF4ER1QKYxXGHrkmxlDahtPiEblHL2 AXUA== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZSSSAt/2/c8pDI5gvizyEOUs6fxZlzyyZawjYFA+2vE=; b=mEkVlpCOOLuPBm9d1whzQuXiJ5m3Cfgff6RC4kIpop/6GHGz/Ru6t9pxM1NOtc3nUV HuG91FKN7aDg6t3OP3NfrRBbkBg5zKeZPgYXZNPW+WaycAYM8c9iMcEm4R9Urw2lkLzP xsyNJwIPYqOZxhhLkodoYwG9KW8d+xSM7L+ewOpv+1uKNQimfdFsLfUl+ig9AeTjJvKv S8OTVr4l8DK/MQnjTbyVajbOsXoM4FsytNTBDcCcZrgRPC/d78DxJ/l4UrfrHMcs2KWr 7M0CUCta4XZoREsKCMxENOhss1fo8OdHXXeEs9WGTirTqvvUSP8WLYipQUwMqVTm3bKX KURA== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOPr4FUoUYyIfebZdEMkTfaC0AoRLWUzVomuGkzTsNG43IxNJOk8qLKWU3lHLv6WqrPPjHCvgcuQr9qifYjv6e5y |
| X-Received | by 10.157.16.109 with SMTP id o42mr3882234oto.114.1463011243898; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:00:43 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 93 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 11 May 2016 17:00:24 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CALCETrVOn43sOKQtpHAxcdCF_qCfsLCvCvVwWZFA=BieSxTK+A@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <1462913803-29634-1-git-send-email-mguzik@redhat.com> <CALCETrUHdS_tq_vR_sasMXA8nXi2sZ9OWfiJfUrygGM9T671Mg@mail.gmail.com> <20160511203527.eidlgiblzx3ixa6j@mguzik> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1399616 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On May 11, 2016 1:35 PM, "Mateusz Guzik" <mguzik@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:58:24PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > This fixes 731e33e39a5b95ad770 "Remove FSBASE/GSBASE < 4G optimization"
> >
> > Indeed. How did that survive lockdep?
> >
>
> lockdep_sys_exit only checks actual locks.
>
> In the common path after return from particular syscall interrupts get
> blindly disabled (as opposed to checking first that they are enabled).
> preemption count is not checked in the fast path at all and is checked
> elsewhere as a side effect of calls to e.g. schedule().
>
> How about a hack along these lines (note I don't claim this is
> committable as it is, but it should work):
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index ec138e5..5887bc7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,24 @@ static void syscall_slow_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 cached_flags)
> tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, step);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> +/*
> + * Called after syscall handlers return.
> + */
> +__visible void syscall_assert_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "invalid state on exit from syscall %ld: "
> + "in_atomic(): %d, irqs_disabled(): %d, pid: %d, "
> + "name: %s\n", regs->orig_ax, in_atomic(),
> + irqs_disabled(), current->pid, current->comm);
> + }
> +
> + if (irqs_disabled())
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Called with IRQs on and fully valid regs. Returns with IRQs off in a
> * state such that we can immediately switch to user mode.
> @@ -314,9 +332,7 @@ __visible inline void syscall_return_slowpath(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> CT_WARN_ON(ct_state() != CONTEXT_KERNEL);
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) &&
> - WARN(irqs_disabled(), "syscall %ld left IRQs disabled", regs->orig_ax))
> - local_irq_enable();
> + syscall_assert_exit(regs);
>
> /*
> * First do one-time work. If these work items are enabled, we
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index 9ee0da1..6c5cc23 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -210,6 +210,12 @@ entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath:
> movq %rax, RAX(%rsp)
> 1:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> + /*
> + * We want to validate bunch of stuff, which will clobber registers.
> + */
> + jmp 2f
> +#endif
> /*
> * If we get here, then we know that pt_regs is clean for SYSRET64.
> * If we see that no exit work is required (which we are required
> @@ -236,6 +242,7 @@ entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath:
> */
> TRACE_IRQS_ON
> ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
> +2:
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS
> movq %rsp, %rdi
> call syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
It would be nice to do this in a cross-arch way. Maybe we could
extend lockdep_sys_exit? Ingo, do you think that would be reasonable?
--Andy
>
> --
> Mateusz Guzik
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] x86/arch_prctl/64: restore accidentally removed put_cpu in ARCH_SET_GS Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-05-10 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/arch_prctl/64: restore accidentally removed put_cpu in ARCH_SET_GS Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com> - 2016-05-11 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/arch_prctl/64: restore accidentally removed put_cpu in ARCH_SET_GS Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-05-12 02:10 +0200
csiph-web