Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64

From	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
Date	2016-05-11 22:40 +0200
Message-ID	<rxJ5f-7qx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rsC4p-5HB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxqvD-5vK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxzSh-6v5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>> >
>> > Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>> > for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for
>> > AArch32 state")
>
> [...]
>
>> > David Daney (2):
>> >   arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages.
>> >   acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
>> >
>> > Hanjun Guo (11):
>> >   acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
>> >   acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
>> >   acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
>> >   acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> >   arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
>> >   x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
>> >   acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
>> >     drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> >   acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
>> >   acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
>> >     drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> >   arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
>> >   acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
>> >
>> > Robert Richter (1):
>> >   acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
>>
>> I need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14].
>
> There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been
> largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take
> a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way.

That would be 4.7 and 4.8 respectively I suppose?

Anyway, Catalin has ACKed all of them except for the [13/14], so
technically I can apply [1-12/14] now and then [13-14/14] can be
applied when they are ready.

Do you think there will be any problems with merging [6-7/14] into 4.7
via the ACPI tree?

Thread

Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-11 02:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-05-11 12:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-11 22:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-11 23:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-12 00:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-05-12 11:00 +0200

csiph-web