Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1399024
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared |
| Date | 2016-05-11 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxBAM-8ht-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rwR4S-3QS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwR4T-3QS-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxAY1-7z7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:55:56PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > @@ -7842,13 +7842,13 @@ static inline void set_cpu_sd_state_busy > > int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > > > > rcu_read_lock(); > > - sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu)); > > + sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu)); > > > > if (!sd || !sd->nohz_idle) > > goto unlock; > > sd->nohz_idle = 0; > > > > - atomic_inc(&sd->groups->sgc->nr_busy_cpus); > > + atomic_inc(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus); > > unlock: > > rcu_read_unlock(); > > } > > This breaks my POWER7 box which presumably doesn't have SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES, > Hmm, PPC folks; what does your topology look like? Currently your sched_domain_topology, as per arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c seems to suggest your cores do not share cache at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POWER7 seems to agree and states "4 MB L3 cache per C1 core" And http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/systems_power_software_i_perfmgmt_underthehood.pdf also explicitly draws pictures with the L3 per core. _however_, that same document describes L3 inter-core fill and lateral cast-out, which sounds like the L3s work together to form a node wide caching system. Do we want to model this co-operative L3 slices thing as a sort of node-wide LLC for the purpose of the scheduler ? While we should definitely fix the assumption that an LLC exists (and I need to look at why it isn't set to the core domain instead as well), the scheduler does try and scale things by 'assuming' LLC := node. It does this for NOHZ, and these here patches under discussion would be doing the same for idle-core state. Would this make sense for power, or should we somehow think of something else?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: select_idle_siblings rewrite Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-09 13:00 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-09 13:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-11 14:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 14:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 20:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 20:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> - 2016-05-12 04:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-12 07:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> - 2016-05-12 13:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-12 13:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-11 20:10 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Remove unused @cpu argument from destroy_sched_domain*() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-09 13:00 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Introduce struct sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-09 13:00 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Optimize SCHED_SMT Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-09 13:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: select_idle_siblings rewrite Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> - 2016-05-10 03:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: select_idle_siblings rewrite Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> - 2016-05-11 16:30 +0200
csiph-web