Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the iommu tree

From	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the iommu tree
Date	2016-05-11 13:40 +0200
Message-ID	<rxAEF-7mh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rxs4q-7l8-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Stephen, Rob,

On 11/05/16 03:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the dt-rh tree got a conflict in:
>
>    drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>
> between commit:
>
>    d54663573131 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Use per-domain page sizes.")
>
> from the iommu tree and commit:
>
>    cb6c27bb0912 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Make use of phandle iterators in device-tree parsing")
>
> from the dt-rh tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Sorry, I'll take partial responsibility for that, as I'd forgotten about 
the SMMU patch Rob was carrying when Joerg picked up my conflicting 
patches. The resolution looks fine to me.

Robin.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the iommu tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-05-11 04:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the iommu tree Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-05-11 13:40 +0200

csiph-web