Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1397222
| From | Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware |
| Date | 2016-05-09 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rwXal-1D1-73@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rwPPr-2FZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwPPt-2FZ-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwTT3-6II-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Synopsys |
On Monday 09 May 2016 07:24 PM, Vince Weaver wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2016, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> This allows userspace to identify this case specifically from the >> catch all error msg it prints currently. >> >> This is an ABI change > > An ABI change which will probably break things. Right thats what I feared. But hold on, I don't think we need to change the ABI to achieve what we want. Gosh why did I even take that path. Currently the errno switch case in perf_evsel__open_strerror() in doesn't handle ENOTSUPP. So how about we add that - augmented with the same sample_period !0 check to barf for lack of sampling support. Do you see anything wrong with that ? -Vineet > > The original change from ENODEV to ENOTSUPP managed to break things > although it took four kernel releases before anyone noticed. > > The usage of ENOTSUPP was my fault, though I feel like at the time I was > told that ENOTSUPP is for internal kernel usage and would be converted to > EOPNOTSUPP when returning an error to userspace. But now I > can't find any sort of reference for that at all, except the fact that > > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/errno.h > > has > /* Linux has no ENOTSUP error code. */ > # define ENOTSUP EOPNOTSUPP > > in it... but wait, that's ENOTSUP not ENOTSUPP. Blargh. > > Vince >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 0/2] report perf sampling failing due to PMU lacking overflow intr support Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-05-09 11:40 +0200
[RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-05-09 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> - 2016-05-09 16:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> - 2016-05-09 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> - 2016-05-11 05:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 21:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-05-12 08:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-12 08:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-05-12 09:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: change errno for sampling event not supported in hardware Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-12 09:30 +0200
csiph-web