Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1397097
| From | Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k |
| Date | 2016-05-09 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rwUvL-7tx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <rkACv-5ln-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkEZs-vr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqkv0-7RT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqmGv-1gD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqmQa-1lx-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 21/04/16 15:27, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 21 April 2016 15:12:52 Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 21/04/16 12:57, Pali Rohár wrote: >>> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Rohár wrote: >>>> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management >>>>>> mode on cpu 0. >>>>>> Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend >>>>>> resume cycles in between. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> V4: add call to get_online_cpus() >>>>> >>>>> Pali, any chance to test this ? >>>> >>>> I can test it, but just on machine where (probably) smm calls can be >>>> send from any cpu... Need some time for testing and I believe I can do >>>> that at the end of the week. >>> >>> Sorry I had absolutely no more free time last weekend :-( And same >>> prediction is for this weekend and also next one... >> >> Pali, I've got a Dell laptop (Latitude E6440) here. Would this device be >> okay for a test? > > Hi! > > Proper regression test should check if this patch does not break any > function or drivers dependent on dcdbas.ko. And should be done on both > notebook devices: which needs to issue that smm call on cpu 0 and also > on which it is not needed. Hmm, couldn't get one which needs smm to be called on cpu 0. OTOH I've done various tests and added a printk() in raise_smm() and i8k_smm_func() issuing the cpu number it was called on. > Some notebooks which needs smm call to issued from cpu 0 can be found in > git commit messages of i8k, dell-laptop or dcdbas kernel drivers. > >> What would you do for testing? In case you can give me >> some hints how to do a sensible test I'd do it. > > Test e.g. dell-laptop.ko driver. It provides /sys interface for changing > keyboard backlight or changing rfkill switches (bluetooth wifi). Done. > Also test tools from libsmbios (userspace) package. Done. > There must be no difference in output/functionality with or without your > patches. Verified. >> I've verified by adding a printk() to smp_call_on_cpu() that at least >> one of the modified drivers has been used during system boot. > > Also you can patch i8k/dcdbas smm function to print cpu number on which > is code running (to verify that it was really called on cpu 0 as > needed). Done. I tested suspend/resume, too, as adding get_online_cpus() might have changed behavior. Worked like a charm. :-) Juergen
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-05-09 16:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 11:00 +0200
csiph-web