Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1397118
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors |
| Date | 2016-05-09 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rwUP8-7Fi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rvVWW-4tS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvVWX-4tS-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwsJd-3ub-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwBW9-3DW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 06:46:13PM +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 01:52 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:53:09PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote: > > > > > > From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> > > > > > > dax_clear_sectors() cannot handle poisoned blocks. These must be > > > zeroed using the BIO interface instead. Convert ext2 and XFS to > > > use > > > only sb_issue_zerout(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> > > > [vishal: Also remove the dax_clear_sectors function entirely] > > > Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > > Just to make sure: the existing sb_issue_zerout as in 4.6-rc > > is already doing the right thing for DAX? I've got a pending > > patchset > > for XFS that introduces another dax_clear_sectors users, but if it's > > already safe to use blkdev_issue_zeroout I can switch to that and > > avoid > > the merge conflict. > > I believe so - Jan has moved all unwritten extent conversions out of > DAX with his patch set, and I believe zeroing through the driver is > always fine. Ross or Jan could confirm though. Yep, I believe that the existing sb_issue_zeroout() as of v4.6-rc* does the right thing. We'll end up calling sb_issue_zeroout() => blkdev_issue_zeroout() => __blkdev_issue_zeroout() because we don't have support for discard or write_same in PMEM. This will send zero page BIOs to the PMEM driver, which will do the zeroing as normal writes.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/5] dax: handling media errors (clear-on-zero only) Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> - 2016-05-07 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v5 2/5] dax: enable dax in the presence of known media errors (badblocks) Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> - 2016-05-07 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v5 3/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> - 2016-05-07 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-05-08 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> - 2016-05-08 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2016-05-09 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-05-10 16:20 +0200
[PATCH v5 5/5] dax: fix a comment in dax_zero_page_range and dax_truncate_page Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> - 2016-05-07 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] dax: fix a comment in dax_zero_page_range and dax_truncate_page Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-05-10 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] dax: handling media errors (clear-on-zero only) Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-05-08 11:00 +0200
csiph-web