Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1395106
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch |
| Date | 2016-05-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rvrvQ-MH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rv3Dd-38F-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <rv4SC-4va-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rv685-5L8-81@gated-at.bofh.it> <rv7GN-7iY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvmPE-4Dm-161@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: > I think it boils down to the following problem. > > 1. CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y > > 2. we have dynamic kobjects, so there is a pointer in klp_patch to struct > kobject > > 3. it is allocated during klp_init_patch() and all is fine > > 4. now we want to remove the patch module. It is disabled and module_put() > is called. User calls rmmod on the module. > > 5. klp_unregister_patch() is called in __exit method. > > 6. klp_free_patch() is called. > > 7. kobject_put(patch->kobj) is called. > > ...now it gets interesting... > > 8. among others kobject_cleanup() is scheduled as a delayed work (this is > important). > > 9. there is no completion, so kobject_put returns and the module goes > away. > > 10. someone calls patch enabled_store attribute (for example). They can > because kobject_cleanup() has not been called yet. It is delayed > scheduled. > > ...crash... But what exactly causes the crash? In enabled_store() we can see that the patch isn't in the list, so we can return -EINVAL. -- Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-02 14:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-02 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-03 10:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-03 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-04 00:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 04:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 05:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-04 14:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 15:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-04 16:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-05 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-05 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-05 16:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-05 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-05 23:10 +0200
Re: livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-05-06 02:50 +0200
Re: livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-06 10:00 +0200
csiph-web