Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1395801
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? |
| Date | 2016-05-06 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rvMqC-4be-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rvBbQ-1tA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvBvb-20s-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvBOy-2eS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvMqC-4be-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:25:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, May 06, 2016 02:09:07 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Thursday, May 05, 2016 04:49:22 PM Steve Muckle wrote: >> > > While working on a few patches for schedutil I noticed that the CFS >> > > cpufreq hooks depend on PELT, which depends on CONFIG_SMP. > >> > For governors other than schedutil fixing that would be a matter of >> > adding a !CONFIG_SMP variant of update_load_avg() that will call >> > cpufreq_update_util() and do nothing else. It doesn't matter what >> > is passed via util and max then. >> >> Maybe something like the below, FWIW, as a quick fix for 4.6? > > Right; I suppose that'll have to do for 4.6. OK, thanks! I'll resend it with a changelog and stuff then.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-05-06 01:50 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-05-06 02:10 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-05-06 02:30 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-05-06 02:40 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-06 13:50 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-05-06 02:30 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-05-06 13:50 +0200
Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-06 13:50 +0200
csiph-web