Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1395661
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable |
| Date | 2016-05-06 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rvIn0-P0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <rtosp-4Cn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <ruhfc-8nf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ruZpV-7Yn-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvqq6-8en-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rvI3E-FN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Lianwei Wang wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > Can you eventually come up with a coherent explanation of the problem down to > > the root cause or are we going to play this "move the workaround one step > > down" game for another 10 rounds? > > > Do you agree that any driver can abort the suspend process by > returning an error or NOTIFY_BAD if it is not ready to suspend? > I have explain it and I also copied the example code that abort > suspend by returning an error or NOTIFY_BAD in the pm notifier > callback function. I don't need copied example code which does not tell me what the real problem is. > The cpu_hotplug_disable and cpu_hotplug_enable are called in one of > the PM notifier callback. And they are called from two difference > place. > Below is how it happened: > pm_suspend > |--enter_state > |--suspend_prepare > |--pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE) > | |--call_back_1 > | |--call_back_.. > | |--call_back_n ===> return NOTIFY_BAD to abort call chain and > | | suspend process here > | |--cpu_hotplug_pm_callback() > | | |--cpu_hotplug_disable =====> remember it is not > called yet > | |--call_back_.. > | > |--pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_POST_SUSPEND) > | |--call_back_1 > | |--call_back_.. > | |--call_back_n > | |--cpu_hotplug_pm_callback() > | | |--cpu_hotplug_enable =====> Here it is unbalanced called > | |--call_back_.. > | > So, keep in mind that for pm notifier call chain, the > PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE notifier and PM_POST_SUSPEND notifier is not always > paired called. Sometimes for a driver's pm notifier callback, the > PM_POST_SUSPEND is called without PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE. So that is the real problem: cpu_hotplug_pm_callback(PM_POST_SUSPEND) can be called w/o a previous call to cpu_hotplug_pm_callback(PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE). > > It cannot prevent any unbalanced calls. It mitigates the issue, but that's a > > different problem. > It did not migrate the issue. It give a warning message to log the > unbalanced issue and it also make sure the cpu hotplug continue to > work well even someone do an unbalanced call. It is a good checking as > the enable_irq/disable_irq do. There are some other unbalanced > checking in kernel too. All make sure the kernel has a better > stability. I'm not opposed to do that and I said so several times. But I said as well, that we do not add this without fixing the problem which made you write that patch in the first place. So we have a proper explanation for the real problem now, but we have no fix. And again: Your patch is NOT a fix. Simply because it will emit a warning everytime the above happens. And that's wrong because the abort is a legitimate scenario. So please come up with a sensible fix for the suspend abort issue and then we can add the balance check/fixup to the hotplug_disable/enable() code. Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-04-29 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-02 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-05 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-06 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: handle unbalanced hotplug enable/disable Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 10:10 +0200
csiph-web