Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1394023
| From | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update |
| Date | 2016-05-04 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ruYNb-7b5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rtRNL-3JV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtRNL-3JV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ruVvY-3Xv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>> static void __init sh_of_setup(char **cmdline_p)
>> {
>> - unflatten_device_tree();
>> -
>> - board_time_init = sh_of_time_init;
>> + struct device_node *cpu;
>> + int freq;
You better make freq unsigned.
>> sh_mv.mv_name = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
>> if (!sh_mv.mv_name)
>> sh_mv.mv_name = "Unknown SH model";
>>
>> sh_of_smp_probe();
>> + cpu = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "cpu");
>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(cpu, "clock-frequency", &freq))
>> + preset_lpj = freq / 500;
>> }
>
> I setup the DT-based pseudo-board to use the generic calibrate-delay
> rather than hard-coding lpj. Ideally we could just get rid of bogomips
> completely but there are probably still some things using it. Is there
> a reason you prefer making up a value for lpj based on the cpu clock
> rate?
Calibrating the delay loop takes some time.
However, you shouldn't hardcode 500, but take HZ into account.
I assume you used the default HZ=250, so
preset_lpj = freq / HZ / 2;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> - 2016-05-01 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-05-04 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-04 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> - 2016-05-10 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> - 2016-05-10 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/12] sh: DeviceTree support update Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-05-10 18:30 +0200
csiph-web