Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1393551
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: 4.4: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU |
| Date | Tue, 03 May 2016 17:50:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ruKKe-2eW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rgBdM-339-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgCtb-4bi-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgCMx-4r7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgH9v-7F2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rhXFg-3uj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ri2EW-7se-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ri5Wa-18l-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ri6fx-1xx-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rut6H-24A-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <ruKhc-1Y8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 76 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 3 May 2016 08:46:56 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20160503154656.GA27311@kroah.com> |
| X-Original-References | <56F54EE0.6030004@oracle.com> <56F56172.9020805@crc.id.au> <56F5653B.1090700@oracle.com> <56F5A87A.8000903@crc.id.au> <56FA4336.2030301@crc.id.au> <56FA8DDD.7070406@oracle.com> <56FABF17.7090608@crc.id.au> <56FAC3AC.9050802@crc.id.au> <20160502205431.GA14983@kroah.com> <c959010e-2716-118b-531e-cb1ca539e7ed@crc.id.au> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1393551 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:11:46AM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 03/05/16 06:54, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:04:28AM +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >> Greg, please see below - this is probably more for you...
> >>
> >> On 03/29/2016 04:56 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Interestingly enough, this just happened again - but on a different
> >>> virtual machine. I'm starting to wonder if this may have something to do
> >>> with the uptime of the machine - as the system that this seems to happen
> >>> to is always different.
> >>>
> >>> Destroying it and monitoring it again has so far come up blank.
> >>>
> >>> I've thrown the latest lot of kernel messages here:
> >>> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/346802/59241532
> >>
> >> So I just did a bit of digging via the almighty Google.
> >>
> >> I started hunting for these lines, as they happen just before the stall:
> >> BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff88007b7db480 idx:2 val:-1
> >> BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff880079c638c0 idx:0 val:-1
> >> BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff880079c638c0 idx:2 val:-1
> >>
> >> I stumbled across this post on the lkml:
> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145141546409607
> >>
> >> The patch attached seems to reference the following change in
> >> unmap_mapping_range in mm/memory.c:
> >>> - struct zap_details details;
> >>> + struct zap_details details = { };
> >>
> >> When I browse the GIT tree for 4.4.6:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/mm/memory.c?id=refs/tags/v4.4.6
> >>
> >> I see at line 2411:
> >> struct zap_details details;
> >>
> >> Is this something that has been missed being merged into the 4.4 tree?
> >> I'll admit my kernel knowledge is not enough to understand what the code
> >> actually does - but the similarities here seem uncanny.
> >
> > I'm sorry, I have no idea what you are asking me about here. Did I miss
> > a patch that should be backported? Did I backport something
> > incorrectly?
>
> Hi Greg + all,
>
> I did actually find the cause of my rss-counter problems - being the
> experimental PVH functionality in Xen. It caused a number of corruptions
> both on disk and in memory. Turning this off resolved the problem.
>
> As for the 'fix' above. It seems there was talk that zap_details should
> be defined as { } to avoid a problem in newer versions of the kernel
> that was in linux-next.
>
> The question that I cannot answer (and I leave this open to the more
> knowledgeable on the list than I) is if that fix should also be applied
> to other trees.
>
> So the question as I see it:
> Is this an actual bug that we're just not seeing hit in other kernel
> versions - but the newer oom reaper code from linux-next uncovered it -
> or is the code as-is in the 4.4 tree considered correct?
>
> It could well be that the experimental code in the Xen PVH was tickling
> something that triggered the same type of issue as per the original bug
> report leading to the patch quoted above.
I would recommend working with the xen developers, on their mailing
list, about this issue. If you end up with a patch that needs to be
applied, please let me and stable@ know about it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 4.4: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-05-02 23:00 +0200
Re: 4.4: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU Steven Haigh <netwiz@crc.id.au> - 2016-05-03 17:20 +0200
Re: 4.4: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-05-03 17:50 +0200
csiph-web