Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1393245
| From | Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/18] livepatch: separate enabled and patched states |
| Date | 2016-05-03 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ruEYc-5FG-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rt12N-1W5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rt12P-1W5-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu 2016-04-28 15:44:44, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Once we have a consistency model, patches and their objects will be
> enabled and disabled at different times. For example, when a patch is
> disabled, its loaded objects' funcs can remain registered with ftrace
> indefinitely until the unpatching operation is complete and they're no
> longer in use.
>
> It's less confusing if we give them different names: patches can be
> enabled or disabled; objects (and their funcs) can be patched or
> unpatched:
>
> - Enabled means that a patch is logically enabled (but not necessarily
> fully applied).
>
> - Patched means that an object's funcs are registered with ftrace and
> added to the klp_ops func stack.
>
> Also, since these states are binary, represent them with booleans
> instead of ints.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/livepatch.h | 17 ++++-------
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index 6ea6880..2b59230 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -622,20 +622,20 @@ static ssize_t enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> if (ret)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (val != KLP_DISABLED && val != KLP_ENABLED)
> + if (val > 1)
> return -EINVAL;
It would be cleaner to get "val" via kstrtobool(). It guarantees that
the value is true or false. Another nice win is that it accepts
Y/y/1/N/n/0 as the input.
> patch = container_of(kobj, struct klp_patch, kobj);
>
> mutex_lock(&klp_mutex);
>
> - if (val == patch->state) {
> + if (patch->enabled == val) {
Also this check will be cleaner if "val" is a boolean.
Best Regards,
Petr
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH v2 00/18] livepatch: hybrid consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 14/18] livepatch: remove unnecessary object loaded check Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 10/18] livepatch/powerpc: add TIF_PATCH_PENDING thread flag Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/18] livepatch/powerpc: add TIF_PATCH_PENDING thread flag Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-03 11:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/18] livepatch/powerpc: add TIF_PATCH_PENDING thread flag Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-03 14:10 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 16/18] livepatch: store function sizes Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 22:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 22:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-04-30 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-30 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-30 02:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-30 00:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-30 02:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-02 16:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-05-02 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-02 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-05-02 20:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-02 20:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-02 21:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-02 22:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-02 22:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-05-03 02:50 +0200
RE: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-05-04 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] sched: add task flag for preempt IRQ tracking Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 22:20 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 09/18] livepatch/x86: add TIF_PATCH_PENDING thread flag Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/18] livepatch/x86: add TIF_PATCH_PENDING thread flag Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/18] livepatch/x86: add TIF_PATCH_PENDING thread flag Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 22:20 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 02/18] x86/asm/head: use a common function for starting CPUs Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 13/18] livepatch: separate enabled and patched states Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/18] livepatch: separate enabled and patched states Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-03 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/18] livepatch: separate enabled and patched states Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-03 15:50 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 06/18] x86: dump_trace() error handling Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/18] x86: dump_trace() error handling Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/18] x86: dump_trace() error handling Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 16:10 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 21:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-29 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-30 01:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-30 02:20 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 04/18] x86: move _stext marker before head code Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 23:00 +0200
[RFC PATCH v2 01/18] x86/asm/head: clean up initial stack variable Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-28 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-04 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-05 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-05 15:10 +0200
barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-04 14:40 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-04 16:00 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 19:00 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-04 16:20 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 19:30 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-05 13:30 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-09 17:50 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 19:10 +0200
Re: barriers: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-05 12:30 +0200
klp_task_patch: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-04 16:50 +0200
Re: klp_task_patch: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-05-04 17:00 +0200
Re: klp_task_patch: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-04 20:00 +0200
Re: klp_task_patch: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-05 14:00 +0200
Re: klp_task_patch: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-06 14:40 +0200
Re: klp_task_patch: was: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-09 14:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-05-06 13:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-05-06 14:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-09 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-05-10 13:50 +0200
csiph-web