Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1393140

[tip:core/signals] signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures

From tip-bot for Stas Sergeev <tipbot@zytor.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [tip:core/signals] signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures
Date 2016-05-03 10:00 +0200
Message-ID <ruDpp-3Rg-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rnW3M-7VI-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Commit-ID:  0b4521e8cf1f582da3045ea460427ac2f741578f
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0b4521e8cf1f582da3045ea460427ac2f741578f
Author:     Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
AuthorDate: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 23:20:02 +0300
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 3 May 2016 08:37:58 +0200

signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures

Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size"
to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack.
The common practice used by all other arches is to check for
sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0

This patch makes the code consistent with other architectures.

The slight complexity of the patch is added by the optimization on
!sigstack check that was requested by Andy Lutomirski: sas_ss_flags(sp)==0
already implies that we are not on a sigstack, so the code is shuffled
to avoid the duplicate checking.

This patch should have no user-visible impact.

Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460665206-13646-2-git-send-email-stsp@list.ru
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
index 548ddf7..3e84ef1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
@@ -248,18 +248,17 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, size_t frame_size,
 	if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_64))
 		sp -= 128;
 
-	if (!onsigstack) {
-		/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
-		if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
-			if (current->sas_ss_size)
-				sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
-		} else if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32) &&
-			   (regs->ss & 0xffff) != __USER_DS &&
-			   !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER) &&
-			   ka->sa.sa_restorer) {
-				/* This is the legacy signal stack switching. */
-				sp = (unsigned long) ka->sa.sa_restorer;
-		}
+	/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
+	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
+		if (sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0)
+			sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
+	} else if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32) &&
+		   !onsigstack &&
+		   (regs->ss & 0xffff) != __USER_DS &&
+		   !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER) &&
+		   ka->sa.sa_restorer) {
+		/* This is the legacy signal stack switching. */
+		sp = (unsigned long) ka->sa.sa_restorer;
 	}
 
 	if (fpu->fpstate_active) {

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[tip:core/signals] signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the x86  sigaltstack check with other architectures tip-bot for Stas Sergeev <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-05-03 10:00 +0200
  Re: [tip:core/signals] signals/sigaltstack, x86/signals: Unify the  x86 sigaltstack check with other architectures Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-05-03 18:20 +0200

csiph-web