Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391222
| From | Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use |
| Date | 2016-04-29 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rti3F-7N6-87@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rt8dX-8gG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtafL-1n2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rte02-4gY-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rthKi-7Bl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr, at 11:34:45AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Also, it would be nice to have all things EFI in a single tree, the conflicts are
> > > going to be painful! There's very little reason not to carry this kind of commit:
> > >
> > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 6 +++++
> > > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 17 +++++++++-----
> > > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > in the EFI tree.
> >
> > That's true. I'll drop this commit from xentip and let Matt pick it up
> > or request changes as he sees fit.
>
> One small change I think would be sensible to make is to expand
> EFI_PARAVIRT into a few more bits to clearly indicate the quirks on
> Xen, and in the process, to delete EFI_PARAVIRT.
>
> That should address Ingo's major concern, and also make it much easier
> to rework the code in a piecemeal fashion.
>
> Could somebody enumerate the things that make Xen (dom0) different on
> arm* compared with bare metal EFI boot? The list I made for x86 was,
>
> 1. Has no EFI memory map
> 2. Runtime regions do not need to be mapped
> 3. Cannot call SetVirtualAddressMap()
> 4. /sys/firmware/efi/fw_vendor is invisible
>
> The first maps to not setting EFI_MEMMAP, the second to not setting
> EFI_RUNTIME. If we add EFI_ALREADY_VIRTUAL and EFI_FW_VENDOR_INVISIBLE
> to efi.flags that should cover everything on x86. Does arm* require
> anything else?
Xen on ARM is different, the impact should be limited:
- there are no BootServices (ExitBootServices has already been called)
- RuntimeServices go via hypercalls
The UEFI memory map is still available at an address specified on device
tree like on native, but the compatibility string is different
("xen,uefi-mmap-start") to clarify that we are booting on Xen rather
than native.
That's pretty much it, Shannon please confirm.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-04-29 06:30 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 08:40 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-29 10:30 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-04-29 11:30 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 12:40 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 12:50 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-04-29 16:40 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-04-29 17:00 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> - 2016-04-30 16:20 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-04-30 22:50 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> - 2016-05-01 05:30 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-01 15:30 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> - 2016-05-01 16:40 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-02 12:50 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> - 2016-05-03 03:50 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-04 13:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> - 2016-05-03 11:20 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:00 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 17:40 +0200
Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> - 2016-04-30 16:10 +0200
csiph-web