Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390695
| From | Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/6] sched/fair: Change the variable to hold the number of periods to 32bit integer |
| Date | 2016-04-29 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rt6c9-6B4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rsRwt-1zl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsRGc-1DA-65@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsY4W-7Js-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:29:55AM -0700, bsegall@google.com wrote: > Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> writes: > > > Now a period is about 1ms, so a 32-bit unsigned integer can approximately > > hold a maximum of 49 (=2^32/1000/3600/24) days, which means it is big enough > > and 64-bit is needless. > > > If a thread sleeps for 49 days and then wakes up this would be wrong... > but it also would just result in it not being decayed to zero, and even > then only if it was in a very small window, so it doesn't seem like a > huge deal if it happens. Oh, yeah, and we wouldn't know that task is as sleepy as it realy is. :)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/6] Optimize sched averages computation Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2016-04-28 12:50 +0200
[PATCH 3/6] sched/fair: Change the variable to hold the number of periods to 32bit integer Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2016-04-28 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/6] sched/fair: Change the variable to hold the number of periods to 32bit integer bsegall@google.com - 2016-04-28 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/6] sched/fair: Change the variable to hold the number of periods to 32bit integer Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2016-04-29 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched/fair: Optimize sum computation with a lookup table bsegall@google.com - 2016-04-28 19:30 +0200
csiph-web