Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1388744
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams |
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rssy6-5VB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rpcga-1JC-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rpyJI-3gW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rs9lM-6K3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rss54-5GG-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rssoq-5QU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:43:35PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > On (04/27/16 16:29), Minchan Kim wrote: > [..] > > > the test: > > > > > > -- 4 GB x86_64 box > > > -- zram 3GB, lzo > > > -- mem-hogger pre-faults 3GB of pages before the fio test > > > -- fio test has been modified to have 11% compression ratio (to increase the > > > chances of re-compressions) > > > > Could you test concurrent mem hogger with fio rather than pre-fault before fio test > > in next submit? > > this test will not prove anything, unfortunately. I performed it; > and it's impossible to guarantee even remotely stable results. > mem-hogger process can spend on pre-fault from 41 to 81 seconds; > so I'm quite sceptical about the actual value of this test. > > > > considering buffer_compress_percentage=11, the box was under somewhat > > > heavy pressure. > > > > > > now, the results > > > > Yeb, Even, recompression case is fater than old but want to see more heavy memory > > pressure case and the ratio I mentioned above. > > I did quite heavy testing over the last 7 days, with numerous OOM kills > and OOM panics. Okay, I think it's worth to merge enough and see the result. Please send formal patch which has recompression stat. ;-) Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 10:00 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-04-19 10:00 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:10 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 13:30 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-04-27 09:30 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:50 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-04-27 10:00 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:10 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:00 +0200
Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:10 +0200
csiph-web