Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1388772
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd: Explicitly define PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES as undefined. |
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rssHN-6hy-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rsmsG-WH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote: > filter_events() relies on the value of 0 to remove events that are not > applicable, like this one. > > UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:132:30 > index 9 is out of range for type 'u64 [9]' > UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:132:9 > load of address ffffffff81c021c8 with insufficient space > for an object of type 'const u64' > > Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> > --- > arch/x86/events/amd/core.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c > index 86a9bec..5fa1b8e 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/core.c > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static const u64 amd_perfmon_event_map[] = > [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 0x00c3, > [PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND] = 0x00d0, /* "Decoder empty" event */ > [PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND] = 0x00d1, /* "Dispatch stalls" event */ > + [PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES] = 0, > }; Hm, I think it would be cleaner and more robust to change this (and all other similar, if any) arrays to [PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] instead. Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] perf/x86/amd: Explicitly define PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES as undefined. Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2016-04-27 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd: Explicitly define PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES as undefined. Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-27 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd: Explicitly define PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES as undefined. Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
csiph-web