Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1388588

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

Show all headers | View raw

On 26-04-16, 20:14, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled either
> built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c    | 14 +++++++-------
>  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-04-27 02:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-27 04:10 +0200

csiph-web