Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390127
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus |
| Date | 2016-04-28 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rsToB-36j-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rsHx8-1CG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsR3s-1lU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsSLV-2rx-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thursday 28 April 2016 12:53:37 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:00:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 17:58:04 Sagar Dharia wrote: > > > > +int slim_add_device(struct slim_controller *ctrl, struct slim_device *sbdev) > > > This looks like an artifact of ancient pre-DT times. I'd say kill it off before > > someone starts using it. > > Not every architecture uses DT, and even on architectures with DT > support it isn't always the only firmware. In this specific case it's > questionable how many people are going to implement Slimbus at this > point but in general insisting that we go DT only doesn't seem great. > Nothing wrong with adding support for manual board files later if we have a good reason for it, but at the moment, this seems completely ARM/ARM64 specific. I don't foresee mobile phones with ACPI using this subsystem, but even if we got them, it would be a horrible idea to use hardcoded board specific tables in a platform file, and we should insist that whatever firmware is present has a way to describe the slimbus devices. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V5 0/6] Introduce framework for SLIMbus device drivers Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-28 02:00 +0200
[PATCH V5 3/6] slimbus: Add messaging APIs to slimbus framework Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-28 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] slimbus: Add messaging APIs to slimbus framework Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-28 12:00 +0200
[PATCH V5 6/6] slim: qcom: Add runtime-pm support using clock-pause feature Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-28 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-28 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-28 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-28 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-28 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 13:20 +0200
csiph-web