Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1389480

Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024

From Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024
Date 2016-04-27 20:50 +0200
Message-ID <rsCH8-61V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ripBw-6Pd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ripBw-6Pd-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rszzB-3p7-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wednesday 27 April 2016 08:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> +#define MAX77620_MFD_CELL_RES(_name, _res)			\
>> +	{							\
>> +		.name = (_name),				\
>> +		.resources = (_res),				\
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE((_res)),		\
>> +	}
> I'm *still* not accepting this.
>
>> +
>> +static struct mfd_cell max20024_children[] = {
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_NAME("max20024-pinctrl"),
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_RES("max20024-gpio", gpio_resources),
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_NAME("max20024-pmic"),
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_RES("max77620-rtc", rtc_resources),
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_RES("max20024-power", power_resources),
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_NAME("max20024-watchdog"),
>> +	MAX77620_MFD_CELL_NAME("max20024-clock"),
>> +};
> If you want this submission to be accepted this cycle, you're going to
> have to convert this to the traditional way of defining MFD children.

Yaah, I want to have this in current cycle.
Will it be fine as follows? (To have quick agreement)

static const struct mfd_cell max77620_children[] = {
         {
                 .name = "max77620-pinctrl",
         }, {
                 .name = "max77620-gpio",
                 .resource = gpio_resources,
                 .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_resources),
         }, {
         /* and so on */
         },
};


>
>> +		if (x >= tperiod)
>> +			return i;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return i;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int max77620_config_fps(struct max77620_chip *chip,
>> +			       struct device_node *fps_np)
> Lots of mention of 'FPS' here, but noting to so what that is?
>
> What does FPS stand for and what does the FPS do?

FPS is Flexible Power Sequence. It is explained in DT binding doc.

However, I will document the function to make it more clear in next 
revision.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for  MAX77620/MAX20024 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-27 17:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-27 20:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for  MAX77620/MAX20024 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-28 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-28 09:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for  MAX77620/MAX20024 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-28 11:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-04-27 21:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V10 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for  MAX77620/MAX20024 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-28 09:30 +0200

csiph-web