Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1387139
| From | Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 |
| Date | 2016-04-26 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rs3T4-270-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rpPrb-8e3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rrMIx-4QJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rs3T4-270-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Will, David, On 2016/4/26 0:47, David Daney wrote: > On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote: >>> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> >>> >>> Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch >>> set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA >>> information. >>> >>> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the >>> NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two >>> tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and >>> system locality. >> >> Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to >> see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted >> separately: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com >> > > FWIW: Those patches should still apply. I am carrying them in my > development trees, and have not changed them in any way. > >> >> Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch >> interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up >> patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can >> get that queued as a pre-requisite. > > The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI > things. I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and > both seem to work. With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing > jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file > cleanup series. I agree. My patch set is ACPI related enablement, cleanups and consolidations, it would be good to merge as a single patch set as it's self-contained. Thanks Hanjun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 03:50 +0200
[PATCH v5 09/14] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 03:50 +0200
[PATCH v5 14/14] arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-04-25 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-04-26 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-04-26 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-04-26 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-04-26 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-04-27 03:50 +0200
csiph-web