Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1387139

Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64

From Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
Date 2016-04-26 07:40 +0200
Message-ID <rs3T4-270-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rpPrb-8e3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rrMIx-4QJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rs3T4-270-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Will, David,

On 2016/4/26 0:47, David Daney wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>>> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>>>
>>> Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch
>>> set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA
>>> information.
>>>
>>> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
>>> NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two
>>> tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and
>>> system locality.
>>
>> Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to
>> see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted
>> separately:
>>
>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com
>>
>
> FWIW:  Those patches should still apply.  I am carrying them in my
> development trees, and have not changed them in any way.
>
>>
>> Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch
>> interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up
>> patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can
>> get that queued as a pre-requisite.
>
> The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI
> things.  I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and
> both seem to work.  With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing
> jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file
> cleanup series.

I agree. My patch set is ACPI related enablement, cleanups and
consolidations, it would be good to merge as a single patch set
as it's self-contained.

Thanks
Hanjun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v5 00/14]  ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 03:50 +0200
  [PATCH v5 09/14] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 03:50 +0200
  [PATCH v5 14/14] arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 04:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 00/14]  ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-04-25 13:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-04-26 07:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-04-26 14:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-04-26 15:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-04-26 15:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-04-27 03:50 +0200

csiph-web