Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1385848
| From | Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: twl: Make sure we have access to powerbus before trying to write to it |
| Date | 2016-04-24 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rrvRn-8ar-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rgRLz-6Ae-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgRLA-6Ae-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rruVj-7re-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On 24.04.2016 19:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> According to the TRM, we need to enable i2c access to powerbus before
>> writing to it. Also, a new write to powerbus should not be attempted if
>> there is a pending transfer. The current code does not implement that
>> functionality and while there are no known problems caused by that, it is
>> better to follow what TRM says.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
>> index 955a6fb..aad748b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
>> #include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
>> -
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * The TWL4030/TW5030/TPS659x0/TWL6030 family chips include power management, a
>> @@ -188,6 +188,74 @@ static int twl6030reg_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> return grp && (val == TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON);
>> }
>>
>> +#define PB_I2C_BUSY BIT(0)
>> +#define PB_I2C_BWEN BIT(1)
>> +
>> +/* Wait until buffer empty/ready to send a word on power bus. */
>> +static int twl4030_wait_pb_ready(void)
>> +{
>> +
>> + int ret;
>> + int timeout = 10;
>> + u8 val;
>> +
>
> Can we do this plain
>
> while (timeout--) {
> }...
>
Now looking at the code, yes, while(timeout--) looks prettier, but as
the $subject patch is in the linux-next for a couple of weeks already,
that change will need another patch. I'll put that in my TODO, right
after the RFC for the N900 cameras :) .
> ? Also... if the bit is not immediately available, it will wait for
> 1msec. Would it make sense to have timeout = 1000 but wait only 10usec
> each time or something?
>
Well, anyway these look like a kind of arbitrary values, I guess it will
work both ways. But, I borrowed the code in the patch from stock Nokia
kernel, it has been field tested on tens of thousands of devices, so,
unless you have hard values giving a reason to do it the other way, I
prefer to keep it as it is.
Regards,
Ivo
>> + do {
>> + ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_MASTER, &val,
>> + TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PB_CFG);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (!(val & PB_I2C_BUSY))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + mdelay(1);
>> + timeout--;
>> + } while (timeout);
>> +
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +}
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: twl: Make sure we have access to powerbus before trying to write to it Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-04-24 18:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: twl: Make sure we have access to powerbus before trying to write to it Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 19:20 +0200
csiph-web