Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1385729
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback |
| Date | 2016-04-23 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rrdrr-1yr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rp8YW-7TI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rp8YW-7TI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr16W-6v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 04/23/2016 02:21 AM, xiakaixu wrote:
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 40b57bf4852c..d941f69dfb4b 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>
>> #include "blk.h"
>> #include "blk-mq.h"
>> +#include "blk-wb.h"
>>
>> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(block_bio_remap);
>> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(block_rq_remap);
>> @@ -880,6 +881,7 @@ blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q, request_fn_proc *rfn,
>>
>> fail:
>> blk_free_flush_queue(q->fq);
>> + blk_wb_exit(q);
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
>> @@ -1395,6 +1397,7 @@ void blk_requeue_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>> blk_delete_timer(rq);
>> blk_clear_rq_complete(rq);
>> trace_block_rq_requeue(q, rq);
>> + blk_wb_requeue(q->rq_wb, rq);
>>
>> if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_QUEUED)
>> blk_queue_end_tag(q, rq);
>> @@ -1485,6 +1488,8 @@ void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
>> /* this is a bio leak */
>> WARN_ON(req->bio != NULL);
>>
>> + blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb, req);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Request may not have originated from ll_rw_blk. if not,
>> * it didn't come out of our reserved rq pools
>> @@ -1714,6 +1719,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>> int el_ret, rw_flags, where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT;
>> struct request *req;
>> unsigned int request_count = 0;
>> + bool wb_acct;
>>
>> /*
>> * low level driver can indicate that it wants pages above a
>> @@ -1766,6 +1772,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>> }
>>
>> get_rq:
>> + wb_acct = blk_wb_wait(q->rq_wb, bio, q->queue_lock);
>> +
>> /*
>> * This sync check and mask will be re-done in init_request_from_bio(),
>> * but we need to set it earlier to expose the sync flag to the
>> @@ -1781,11 +1789,16 @@ get_rq:
>> */
>> req = get_request(q, rw_flags, bio, GFP_NOIO);
>> if (IS_ERR(req)) {
>> + if (wb_acct)
>> + __blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb);
>> bio->bi_error = PTR_ERR(req);
>> bio_endio(bio);
>> goto out_unlock;
>> }
>>
>> + if (wb_acct)
>> + req->cmd_flags |= REQ_BUF_INFLIGHT;
>> +
>> /*
>> * After dropping the lock and possibly sleeping here, our request
>> * may now be mergeable after it had proven unmergeable (above).
>> @@ -2515,6 +2528,7 @@ void blk_start_request(struct request *req)
>> blk_dequeue_request(req);
>>
>> req->issue_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
>> + blk_wb_issue(req->q->rq_wb, req);
>>
>> /*
>> * We are now handing the request to the hardware, initialize
>> @@ -2751,6 +2765,7 @@ void blk_finish_request(struct request *req, int error)
>> blk_unprep_request(req);
>>
>> blk_account_io_done(req);
>> + blk_wb_done(req->q->rq_wb, req);
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Seems the function blk_wb_done() will be executed twice even if the end_io
> callback is set.
> Maybe the same thing would happen in blk-mq.c.
Yeah, that was a mistake, the current version has it fixed. It was
inadvertently added when I discovered that the flush request didn't work
properly. Now it just duplicates the call inside the check for if it has
an ->end_io() defined, since we don't use the normal path for that.
--
Jens Axboe
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> - 2016-04-18 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback xiakaixu <xiakaixu@huawei.com> - 2016-04-23 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> - 2016-04-23 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback xiakaixu <xiakaixu@huawei.com> - 2016-04-25 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> - 2016-04-25 16:40 +0200
csiph-web