Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1385718
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() |
| Date | 2016-04-23 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rrbIZ-a3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rqRKk-Ux-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr3BN-24g-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.c >> @@ -1,7 +1,13 @@ >> +/* >> + * This provides an optimized implementation of memcpy, and a simplified >> + * implementation of memset and memmove, to avoid problems with the >> + * built-in implementations when running in the restricted decompression >> + * stub environment. >> + */ > > Does 'built in' here mean the compiler's implementation? > > We cannot call kernel built-in functions yet, so we have to duplicate everything > we might need, right? Right, I actually mean both: we can use neither gcc nor kernel built-ins. (I am fuzzy on why the gcc built-ins aren't available -- I think because they're not available for standalone builds.) -Kees > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-23 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-23 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-23 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-25 09:40 +0200
csiph-web