Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1384671
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach |
| Date | 2016-04-22 05:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rqzu2-2Yo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rqj5U-6Uw-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I still have a massive problem with the claims that the "Jitter" RNG provides any amount of entropy. Just because you and I might not be able to analyze it doesn't mean that somebody else couldn't. After all, DUAL-EC DRNG was very complicated and hard to analyze. So would be something like AES(NSA_KEY, COUNTER++) Very hard to analyze indeed. Shall we run statistical tests? They'll pass with flying colors. Secure? Not so much. - Ted
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-21 11:30 +0200
[PATCH 4/6] crypto: LRNG - enable compile Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-21 11:30 +0200
[PATCH 5/6] crypto: LRNG - hook LRNG into interrupt handler Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-21 11:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/6] crypto: DRBG - externalize DRBG functions for LRNG Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-21 11:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-21 15:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@gnutls.org> - 2016-04-21 15:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-21 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@gnutls.org> - 2016-04-25 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-25 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@gnutls.org> - 2016-04-25 10:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-04-26 03:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-04-22 05:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-22 07:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 15:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-04-24 17:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-24 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-04-24 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2016-04-25 07:20 +0200
csiph-web