Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1384643
| From | Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree |
| Date | 2016-04-22 02:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rqwFQ-Mv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rp6kq-5ph-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi David,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 207afda1b503 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: share the same default FDB")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
> 009a2b9843bf ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add number of ports to info")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed some of the code updated by the latter)
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
I have another series to send to net-next which will also conflict with this
fix from net. As it is also required in net-next, can the fix be merged
in net-next as well?
This fix is the 3 commits:
65fa40276ac1 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: unlock DSA and CPU ports")
996ecb824667 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: enable SA learning on DSA ports")
207afda1b503 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: share the same default FDB")
For the merge commit:
cf6b5fb2514d ("Merge branch 'dsa-mv88e6xxx-fix-cross-chip-bridging'")
Regards,
Vivien
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-04-18 03:40 +0200 Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-04-22 02:00 +0200
csiph-web