Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1384213
| From | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup |
| Date | 2016-04-21 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rqmQ9-1lx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rqiMA-6KC-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqjyY-78a-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqk1X-7EH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | LWN.net |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800 Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer > > wanted to say here. > > > *it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions > of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way* > > equals > > *it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think. > > So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in > an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong? The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being unacceptable. It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be made. Thanks, jon
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2016-04-21 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-04-21 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2016-04-21 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-04-21 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2016-04-21 15:40 +0200
csiph-web