Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1384831
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c |
| Date | 2016-04-22 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rqFSO-8hs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rq5vY-3Ui-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rq7xN-64O-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqhnr-5sf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rqvJM-8uB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 03:56:07PM -0700, Shi, Yang wrote: > On 4/21/2016 12:30 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Shi, Yang wrote: > >>Hi folks, > >> > >>I didn't realize pmd_* functions are protected by > >>CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE on the most architectures before I made this > >>change. > >> > >>Before I fix all the affected architectures code, I want to check if you > >>guys think this change is worth or not? > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Yang > >> > >>On 4/20/2016 11:24 AM, Yang Shi wrote: > >>>huge_pmd_set_accessed is only called by __handle_mm_fault from memory.c, > >>>move the definition to memory.c and make it static like create_huge_pmd and > >>>wp_huge_pmd. > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> > > > >On pte side we have the same functionality open-coded. Should we do the > >same for pmd? Or change pte side the same way? > > Sorry, I don't quite understand you. Do you mean pte_* functions? See handle_pte_fault(), we do the same for pte there what huge_pmd_set_accessed() does for pmd. I think we should be consistent here: either both are abstructed into functions or both open-coded. -- Kirill A. Shutemov
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-04-20 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-04-20 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-04-20 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2016-04-21 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-04-22 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2016-04-22 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> - 2016-04-21 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2016-04-22 01:00 +0200
csiph-web