Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1383568
| From | Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: delete bindings in iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain |
| Date | 2016-04-20 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rq3Nv-2U9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rpHah-1sn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rpHai-1sn-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 19/04/16 17:56, Eric Auger wrote:
> Now reserved bindings can exist, destroy them when destroying
> the reserved iova domain. iommu_map is not supposed to be atomic,
> hence the extra complexity in the locking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>
> ---
> v6 -> v7:
> - remove [PATCH v6 7/7] dma-reserved-iommu: iommu_unmap_reserved and
> destroy the bindings in iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain
>
> v5 -> v6:
> - use spin_lock instead of mutex
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - previously "iommu/arm-smmu: relinquish reserved resources on
> domain deletion"
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
> index 426d339..2522235 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-reserved-iommu.c
> @@ -157,14 +157,36 @@ void iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
> -
> - rid = (struct reserved_iova_domain *)domain->reserved_iova_cookie;
> - if (!rid) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto unlock;
> + while (1) {
> + struct iommu_reserved_binding *b;
> + struct rb_node *node;
> + dma_addr_t iova;
> + size_t size;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
> +
> + rid = (struct reserved_iova_domain *)
> + domain->reserved_iova_cookie;
Same comment about casting as before.
> + if (!rid) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> + node = rb_first(&domain->reserved_binding_list);
> + if (!node)
> + break;
> + b = rb_entry(node, struct iommu_reserved_binding, node);
> +
> + iova = b->iova;
> + size = b->size;
> +
> + while (!kref_put(&b->kref, reserved_binding_release))
> + ;
Since you're freeing the thing anyway, why not just call the function
directly?
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
> + iommu_unmap(domain, iova, size);
> }
>
> + domain->reserved_binding_list = RB_ROOT;
> domain->reserved_iova_cookie = NULL;
> unlock:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->reserved_lock, flags);
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v7 07/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: delete bindings in iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2016-04-19 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: delete bindings in iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-04-20 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] iommu/dma-reserved-iommu: delete bindings in iommu_free_reserved_iova_domain Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2016-04-21 10:50 +0200
csiph-web