Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1382355
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] clk: composite: Add unregister function |
| Date | 2016-04-19 12:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rpABS-4Lu-59@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rfTZ8-69G-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfU8P-6dp-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rokps-1JE-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:28:56PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/23, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The composite clock didn't have any unregistration function, which forced
> > us to use clk_unregister directly on it.
> >
> > While it was already not great from an API point of view, it also meant
> > that we were leaking the clk_composite structure allocated in
> > clk_register_composite.
> >
> > Add a clk_unregister_composite function to fix this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
>
> I'm currently attempting to change the way clks are registered so
> that we don't return clk pointers from clk_register and have
> users add OF clk providers that return clk_hw pointers instead of
> clk pointers. Just a note, that this whole thing should be
> deleted in the next cycle if I can convert everything!
Ok.
>
> > drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> > index 1f903e1f86a2..b0f3b84ebd13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
> > @@ -286,3 +286,18 @@ err:
> > kfree(composite);
> > return clk;
> > }
> > +
> > +void clk_unregister_composite(struct clk *clk)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_composite *composite;
> > + struct clk_hw *hw;
> > +
> > + hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
> > + if (!hw)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + composite = to_clk_composite(hw);
> > +
> > + clk_unregister(clk);
> > + kfree(composite);
> > +}
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
The register function is not registered, so I don't think that's
necessary.
> Do I need to pick this up?
I have a bunch of other clock patches that need this, so I guess it
would be easier if applied it directly with your acked-by, or if you
could apply it and give a stable branch I can base my future PR on.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] clk: composite: Add unregister function Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-16 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] clk: composite: Add unregister function Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-04-19 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] clk: composite: Add unregister function Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-22 00:20 +0200
csiph-web