Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: do not sleep if IRQ's are still disabled

From	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: do not sleep if IRQ's are still disabled
Date	2016-04-18 04:00 +0200
Message-ID	<rp6DM-5xU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qWq1A-1yb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <romUi-3Jk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:00:53PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > If a clock gets enabled early during boot time, it can lead to a PLL
> > startup. The wait_lock function makes sure that the PLL is really
> > stareted up before it gets used. However, the function sleeps which
> > leads to scheduling and an error:
> > bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
> > ...
> > 
> > Use udelay in case IRQ's are still disabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> 
> This is really old. Shawn, are you picking these up? I'm removing
> these from my queue for now.

Yes, I'm picking them up.

Shawn

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: do not sleep if IRQ's are still disabled Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-16 03:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: imx: do not sleep if IRQ's are still disabled Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-18 04:00 +0200

csiph-web