Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1377893

Re: [PATCH memory-barriers.txt 2/7] documentation: Fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:52:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
> 
> Terms `lock` and `unlock` have changed to `acquire` / `release` by
> commit 2e4f5382d12a441b5cccfdde00308df15c2ce300 ("locking/doc: Rename
> LOCK/UNLOCK to ACQUIRE/RELEASE").  However, the commit missed to change
> the table of content.  This commit changes the missed parts.
> Also, section name `Acquiring functions` is not appropriate for the
> section because the section is saying about lock in actual.  This commit
> changes the name to more appropriate name, `Lock acquisition functions`.
> 

True, because of this ppc thing :/

If we get PPC to switch to RCsc locks, there actually is a difference
again.

Given the current state I'm not sure how much we should care, but
there's a fundamental difference between things like load-acquire and
acquiring a lock, in that the lock-acquire must also very much imply a
store.

In any case, these are jet-lagged ramblings, feel free to ignore :-)

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH memory-barriers.txt 2/7] documentation: Fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-12 18:00 +0200
  [tip:locking/core] locking/Documentation: Fix missed s/lock/acquire  renames tip-bot for SeongJae Park <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-04-13 09:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH memory-barriers.txt 2/7] documentation: Fix missed  renaming: s/lock/acquire Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-13 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH memory-barriers.txt 2/7] documentation: Fix missed  renaming: s/lock/acquire "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-13 17:20 +0200

csiph-web