Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1377339
| From | Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time |
| Date | 2016-04-12 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rnem6-61z-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <rncki-4di-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rncWZ-4S9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rncX0-4S9-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnd6G-4Yr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rndgm-52b-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Candela Technologies |
On 04/12/2016 01:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >> It worked well enough for years that I didn't even know other algorithms were >> available. It was broken around 4.0 time, and I reported it to the list, >> and no one seemed to really care enough to do anything about it. I changed >> to reno and ignored the problem as well. >> >> It is trivially easy to see the regression when using ath10k NIC, and from this email >> thread, I guess other NICs have similar issues. > > Since it is so trivial, why don't you start a bisection ? I vaguely remember doing a bisect, but I can't find any email about that, so maybe I didn't. At any rate, it is somewhere between 3.17 and 4.0. From memory, it was between 3.19 and 4.0, but I am not certain of that. Neil's suggestion, from the thread below, is that it was likely: "605ad7f tcp: refine TSO autosizing" Here is previous email thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg80803.html This one has a link to a pcap I made at the time: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg80890.html > > I asked a capture, I did not say ' switch to Reno or whatever ', right ? > > Guessing is nice, but investigating and fixing is better. > > Do not assume that nothing can be done, please ? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time "Machani, Yaniv" <yanivma@ti.com> - 2016-04-12 14:20 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 17:00 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> - 2016-04-12 17:10 +0200
RE: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time "Machani, Yaniv" <yanivma@ti.com> - 2016-04-12 21:40 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> - 2016-04-12 22:20 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:20 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> - 2016-04-12 22:30 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 22:40 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> - 2016-04-12 23:50 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> - 2016-04-13 05:10 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 05:40 +0200
RE: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time "Machani, Yaniv" <yanivma@ti.com> - 2016-04-13 22:30 +0200
Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> - 2016-04-12 19:10 +0200
csiph-web