Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1379185
| From | Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access |
| Date | 2016-04-14 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rnTSi-69H-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rnRGO-44y-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnSCS-4Y2-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnTyX-5JF-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 01:48:31PM -0400, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:45:50AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:41:35AM -0700, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > > > This patch series removes the write() interface for user access in favor of an > > > ioctl() based approach. This is in response to the complaint that we had > > > different handlers for write() and writev() doing different things and expecting > > > different types of data. See: > > > > I think we should wait on applying these patches until we globally sort out > > what to do with the rdma uapi. > > > > It just doesn't make alot of sense for drivers to have their own personal > > char devices. :( > > I'm afraid I have to disagree at this time. Someday we may have "1 char device > to rule them all" but right now we don't have any line of sight to that > solution. It may be _years_ before we can agree to the semantics which will > work for all high speed, kernel bypass, rdma, low latency, network devices. There are some pretty obvious paths to make this saner that could only be a few weeks away, we haven't even had the first conversations yet. I think you are completely wrong there is no 'line of sight' It certainly can't be years. There is some rational for a very driver specific thing, but EEPROM and snoop? Seriously? Jason
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> - 2016-04-14 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-04-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> - 2016-04-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-04-14 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> - 2016-04-14 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-04-14 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu> - 2016-04-15 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> - 2016-04-15 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> - 2016-04-14 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IB/hfi1: Remove write() and use ioctl() for user access Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-04-14 20:50 +0200
csiph-web