Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1377015
| From | Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping |
| Date | 2016-04-12 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rn9FM-22N-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rmSOC-4W8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmSOC-4W8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmY7E-ZZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmY7E-ZZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:26:25AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: [...] > Quoting Bjorn's original reply to the previous series: > > > Some of the code that moved to drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c is not > > really ACPI-specific, and could potentially be used for non-ACPI > > bridges that support ECAM. I'd like to see that sort of code > > moved to a new file like drivers/pci/ecam.c. > > So my guess is that this is the reasoning behind JC's file layout. > > I'm curious what Lorenzo's take on things is currently. I assume this > series is now to be the official coordinated version of this effort for > upstream, following the advice of Bjorn previously, but I would like to > know if everyone is behind this plan. I've (previously) requested a > Linaro LEG meeting this week (part of our bootarch working group) to > specifically discuss the status of PCI upstreaming in order to get the > different vendors together to ensure every single one of them is > tracking the correct latest effort and doing what is needed to test/aid, > hence my ask. If this is now plan A, I'll make sure everyone is aligned > behind it and start pinging people individually for testing. My take is that JC's aim is to get this four patch series reviewed and merged (which is *not* sufficient to get ACPI PCI to work fully on ARM64 - see cover letter - the remaining patches in his branch are not fixes, it is code that is required to get things to work, these 4 patches stand alone are not sufficient but I understand he wants to get them reviewed following feedback on the lists) so that we can make progress on ACPI PCI on ARM64. I will comment on the patches as soon as I have time to review them, I certainly would like to understand what we have to do with the rest of the code though (provided this series is good to go) see above. Lorenzo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI based PCI host driver with generic ECAM Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> - 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> - 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> - 2016-04-12 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-04-12 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> - 2016-04-14 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-04-14 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> - 2016-04-14 17:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI: PCI: Add generic PCI host controller Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> - 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI: PCI: Add generic PCI host controller Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-14 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ACPI: PCI: Add generic PCI host controller Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-14 18:00 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Prepare to use generic ACPI PCI implementation Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> - 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200
csiph-web