Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1376814

Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree

From Eddie Chapman <eddie@ehuk.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree
Date 2016-04-12 15:50 +0200
Message-ID <rn6RA-8dh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <rmZZL-2Fs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn09s-2Jw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn1If-3Wu-125@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn5LQ-7sP-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn65c-7BQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/04/16 13:52, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:31:21PM +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>> None-the-less, I applaud and thank Sasha for this new effort, and I
>> personally will find it very useful.  Yes, the lines between bug fix and
>> security fix are very blurred, and so this tree won't have every "security"
>> fix. But I believe and trust it *will* at least contain fixes for bugs that
>> have the most severe security impact.
>
> It will only contain them if they are already in the respective stable trees,
> which means that when I miss a fix (common), it won't appear there either.
> At first I thought "oh cool, a repository of known things that must absolutely
> be fixed, that will help me do my backports" and in the end I fear it will be
> blindly used by end users who don't understand what they're missing but who
> still believe they limit the risk of upgrades. Just this morning I saw a
> report of a user saying that haproxy crashes is 2.6.24 kernel which is
> "otherwise perfectly stable and achieves multi-years uptime"... Imagine
> what such users will do when backporting fixes into they multi-thousands-bugs
> kernel!

Yes, agreed. I'm sure it's not going to be an exhaustive, complete 
repository.  But I think it is better than no repository. And I think 
you are right there is a risk some will use it blindly. However, it 
seems to me if they make this mistake then by definition they were 
probably already screwed with regards the issues we're discussing here, 
so things can't really effectively get any worse. So by blindly applying 
a small tree of what have already been regarded as important fixes their 
situation might then be upgraded from 100% screwed to maybe only 70% 
screwed.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2016-04-11 20:00 +0200
  Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 20:20 +0200
    Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0200
  Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 20:40 +0200
    Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0200
      Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Jeff Merkey <linux.mdb@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0200
    Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0200
  Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-04-11 20:50 +0200
    Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2016-04-11 21:00 +0200
      Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-04-11 22:10 +0200
        Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2016-04-11 22:40 +0200
          Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-04-11 23:20 +0200
            Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200
              Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-04-12 08:30 +0200
                Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-04-12 08:40 +0200
                Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-04-12 10:20 +0200
                Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Eddie Chapman <eddie@ehuk.net> - 2016-04-12 14:40 +0200
                Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-04-12 15:00 +0200
                Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-stable security tree Eddie Chapman <eddie@ehuk.net> - 2016-04-12 15:50 +0200

csiph-web