Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1374960
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 4.4 128/210] watchdog: dont run proc_watchdog_update if new value is same as old |
| Date | 2016-04-10 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmt3Q-1mn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rmsKu-Wx-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Joshua Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
commit a1ee1932aa6bea0bb074f5e3ced112664e4637ed upstream.
While working on a script to restore all sysctl params before a series of
tests I found that writing any value into the
/proc/sys/kernel/{nmi_watchdog,soft_watchdog,watchdog,watchdog_thresh}
causes them to call proc_watchdog_update().
NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
There doesn't appear to be a reason for doing this work every time a write
occurs, so only do it when the values change.
Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -907,6 +907,9 @@ static int proc_watchdog_common(int whic
* both lockup detectors are disabled if proc_watchdog_update()
* returns an error.
*/
+ if (old == new)
+ goto out;
+
err = proc_watchdog_update();
}
out:
@@ -951,7 +954,7 @@ int proc_soft_watchdog(struct ctl_table
int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
- int err, old;
+ int err, old, new;
get_online_cpus();
mutex_lock(&watchdog_proc_mutex);
@@ -971,6 +974,10 @@ int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_tabl
/*
* Update the sample period. Restore on failure.
*/
+ new = ACCESS_ONCE(watchdog_thresh);
+ if (old == new)
+ goto out;
+
set_sample_period();
err = proc_watchdog_update();
if (err) {
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4.4 128/210] watchdog: dont run proc_watchdog_update if new value is same as old Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-04-10 21:20 +0200
csiph-web