Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1376315
| From | Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 00/46] pwm: add support for atomic update |
| Date | 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmSOC-4W8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <riuBc-28V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Thierry, On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:03:23 +0200 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Hello, > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or IOW, the capability > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period, > duty and polarity) in one go. > > It also adds support for initial PWM state retrieval (or hardware readout), > which should allow smooth handover between the bootloader and Linux. For > example, critical PWM users (like critical regulators controlled by a PWM) > can query the current PWM state, and adapt the PWM config without having > to disable/enable the PWM, or abruptly change the period/dutycyle/polarity > config. > > Thierry, I hope this version meets your expectations, if that's not the > case, could you let me know quickly so I can adjust the implementation > accordingly (I'd really like to get most of those changes in 4.7). Still haven't had a clear feedback from your side on this series (you commented on a few details, but nothing on the general approach). Could you please have at a quick look at it, and let me know if I should adjust the implementation? Note that I plan to send a new version addressing comments made by other maintainers/developers by the end of the week. In the meantime, could you have a look at the first set of patches (patch 1 to 4 are completely independent), and apply them if you're happy with it. As you can see, I now have a lot of patches. This helps in showing the big picture, but also annoys people when I send this 50+ patchset. So, if you don't mind, I'd like to drop the changes touching PWM user drivers (to make them use the atomic API) until we get the other parts applied. Thanks, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v5 00/46] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-04-12 00:50 +0200
csiph-web