Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1376288
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM |
| Date | 2016-04-11 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmRfQ-3RZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rmMpQ-8jk-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmMJc-gC-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmMSR-m0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmNce-te-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rmPe4-21s-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 19:50 +0100, Wols Lists wrote: > On 11/04/16 17:39, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Monday 11 April 2016 09:53 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > > > L stands for "Mailing list that is relevant to this area", and this is a > > > > mailing list. :) > > > Your proposed patch isn't changing the L entry, so this is of no > > > relevance. > > Sorry, I am not understanding. > > > > The current entry in MAINTAINERS is: > > DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM) > > M: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com> > > M: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> > > M: dm-devel@redhat.com > > L: dm-devel@redhat.com > > ... > > > > So my patch just removed the line : "M: dm-devel@redhat.com" > > > > So now the entry becomes : > > DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM) > > M: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com> > > M: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> > > L: dm-devel@redhat.com > > ... > > > > So, now it correctly shows dm-devel@redhat.com as a mailing list which > > should have cc to all the patches related to LVM. > > > > Or am I understanding this wrong? > Yes. Because (I guess M stands for maintainer) this list has maintainer > status. As all patches should be sent to the maintainers therefore all > patches should be sent to this list. > > The same person can appear twice in a phone book, once under their name > and once under their job title. This is exactly the same situation - > this list should appear once as a list to tell people that it's a list, > AND ALSO as a maintainer to tell people that patches must be sent to the > list. > > I guess English is not your first language, but the important point is > that M and L are not mutually exclusive. > I'm a native English speaker and I think that's a not a good argument. Having the same entry for M: and L: where M: isn't an actual person is not a great idea. The list is not a maintainer.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> - 2016-04-11 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> - 2016-04-11 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> - 2016-04-11 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-11 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> - 2016-04-12 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-12 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> - 2016-04-12 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-12 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 07:40 +0200
Re: MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> - 2016-04-12 02:00 +0200
csiph-web