Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1375504

Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race

From Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race
Date 2016-04-11 07:50 +0200
Message-ID <rmCTw-LE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rlaPD-7AE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlaPD-7AE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rleqf-1G9-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/07/2016 02:56 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> On 07/04/16 15:37, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> > follow_huge_(pmd|pud|pgd) functions are used to walk the page table and
>> > fetch the page struct during 'follow_page_mask' call. There are possible
>> > race conditions faced by these functions which arise out of simultaneous
>> > calls of move_pages() and freeing of huge pages. This was fixed partly
>> > by the previous commit e66f17ff7177 ("mm/hugetlb: take page table lock
>> > in follow_huge_pmd()") for only PMD based huge pages.
>> > 
>> > After implementing similar logic, functions like follow_huge_(pud|pgd)
>> > are now safe from above mentioned race conditions and also can support
>> > FOLL_GET. Generic version of the function 'follow_huge_addr' has been
>> > left as it is and its upto the architecture to decide on it.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > ---
>> >  include/linux/mm.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  mm/hugetlb.c       | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> >  2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> > index ffcff53..734182a 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> > @@ -1751,6 +1751,19 @@ static inline void pgtable_page_dtor(struct page *page)
>> >  		NULL: pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address))
>> >  
>> >  #if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> Do we still use USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS? I think its good enough. with pgd's
> we are likely to use the same locks and the split nature may not be really
> split.
> 

Sorry Balbir, did not get what you asked. Can you please elaborate on
this ?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-07 07:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions  from race Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 11:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions  from race Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-11 07:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions  from race Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 14:50 +0200

csiph-web