Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1374624

[PATCH 1/4] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with other arches

From Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH 1/4] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with other arches
Date 2016-04-09 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <rm0uR-52s-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rm0uR-52s-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size"
to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack.
The common practice used by all other arches is to check for
sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0

This patch makes the code consistent with other arches.
The slight complexity of the patch is added by the optimization on
!sigstack check that was requested by Andy Lutomirski: sas_ss_flags(sp)==0
already implies that we are not on a sigstack, so the code is shuffled
to avoid the duplicate checking.

This patch have no any user-visible impact. It is purely a cleanup.

CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: x86@kernel.org
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CC: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
CC: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
index cb6282c..285183b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
@@ -213,18 +213,17 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, size_t frame_size,
 	if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_64))
 		sp -= 128;
 
-	if (!onsigstack) {
-		/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
-		if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
-			if (current->sas_ss_size)
-				sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
-		} else if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32) &&
-			   (regs->ss & 0xffff) != __USER_DS &&
-			   !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER) &&
-			   ka->sa.sa_restorer) {
-				/* This is the legacy signal stack switching. */
-				sp = (unsigned long) ka->sa.sa_restorer;
-		}
+	/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
+	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
+		if (sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0)
+			sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
+	} else if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32) &&
+		   !onsigstack &&
+		   (regs->ss & 0xffff) != __USER_DS &&
+		   !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER) &&
+		   ka->sa.sa_restorer) {
+		/* This is the legacy signal stack switching. */
+		sp = (unsigned long) ka->sa.sa_restorer;
 	}
 
 	if (fpu->fpstate_active) {
-- 
2.7.2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v6(RESEND) 0/4] make sigaltstack() compatible with swapcontext() Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2016-04-09 14:50 +0200
  [PATCH 1/4] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with other arches Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2016-04-09 14:50 +0200
  [PATCH 2/4] sigaltstack: preparations for adding new SS_xxx flags Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2016-04-09 14:50 +0200

csiph-web