Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1374076
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v1.9 07/14] x86/stacktrace: add function for detecting reliable stack traces |
| Date | Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:30:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rlzXI-XP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rgFKp-6zA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgFKr-6zA-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlgLo-3f5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rljpV-5mp-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 14 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com> |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:24:15 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20160408082415.GG5218@pathway.suse.cz> |
| X-Original-References | <cover.1458933243.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> <1f8c648ed8b8eb49a75f5a6cacf8b7ca76f44fa9.1458933243.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> <20160407115552.GB27670@pathway.suse.cz> <20160407144655.kf7ujfctdlvnwx6s@treble.redhat.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1374076 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu 2016-04-07 09:46:55, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:55:52PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Well, I wonder if we should be more suspicious and make > > sure that only the regular process stack is used. > > Notice the save_stack_stack_reliable() function, which is called by > dump_trace() when the task is running on an interrupt or exception > stack. It returns -EINVAL, so the stack gets marked unreliable. Does > that address your concern, or did you mean something else? I see. It does what I wanted. Thanks, Petr
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH v1.9 07/14] x86/stacktrace: add function for detecting reliable stack traces Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-04-07 14:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v1.9 07/14] x86/stacktrace: add function for detecting reliable stack traces Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-04-07 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v1.9 07/14] x86/stacktrace: add function for detecting reliable stack traces Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-04-08 10:30 +0200
csiph-web