Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1373731
| From | Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions |
| Date | 2016-04-07 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rloSC-YH-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <rl4Az-2wG-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlkvF-692-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlkFk-6uI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlnjS-8fc-65@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlnjS-8fc-63@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 04/07/2016 02:58 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Waiman. > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:52:33PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> As long as atomic reset is an optional feature that caller can choose at >> init time, I am OK to provide this functionality. I just don't want it to be >> the default because of the performance overhead. > Please take a look at how percpu-ref coordinates global > synchronization. The hot path overhead is one branch which is > extremely easy to predict and shouldn't show up anywhere. If you're > gonna provide reset at all (which btw always kinda baffles me, what's > wrong with taking a snapshot value and taking delta from there?), you > need to make it actually work reliably. > > Thanks. > I would say that because I am lazy, I don't want compute the deltas every time I want to see the effect of running a certain type of workload on the statistics counts. I have use case that I need to track 10 or so statistics counts and monitor their changes after running a job. It is much more convenient to do a reset and see what you get than doing manual subtractions to find out. I had taken a look at percpu-refcount.[ch]. I think the synchronization code is a bit overkill for this purpose as no one really need a very precise statistics counts nor precise atomic reset. I would prefer providing an optional atomic reset feature with slower statistics count update path for the time being. If we come across a use case where we need atomic reset with negligible slowdown, we could then refactor the code to use something similar to what the percpu-refcount code is doing. Cheers, Longman
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-04-06 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-04-07 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-04-07 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-04-07 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-04-07 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-04-07 21:10 +0200
csiph-web