Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1373299

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for cpufreq_suspended set

Show all headers | View raw

On 07-04-16, 13:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 07-04-16, 03:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Since governor operations are generally skipped if cpufreq_suspended
> >> is set, do nothing at all in cpufreq_start_governor() and
> >> cpufreq_exit_governor() in that case.
> >>
> >> In particular, this prevents fast frequency switching from being
> >> disabled after a suspend-to-RAM cycle on all CPUs except for the
> >> boot one.
> >
> > static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
> > {
> >         int ret;
> >
> >         /* Don't start any governor operations if we are entering suspend */
> >         if (cpufreq_suspended)
> >                 return 0;
> >
> >         ...
> >
> > }
> >
> > Above already guarantees that we would start/stop governors. Why do we
> > need this change then ?
> 
> Because we do extra stuff in cpufreq_start_governor() and
> cpufreq_exit_governor() that *also* shouldn't be done if
> cpufreq_suspended is set.

The only extra thing done by cpufreq_exit_governor() is
cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(), which just plays with
cpufreq_fast_switch_count and policy->fast_switch_enabled.

That should be done even if we have started to suspend.

The exit-governor path is be called while we hot-unplug all non-boot
CPUs during suspend. Which would eventually mean that at least
cpufreq_fast_switch_count will stay positive for ever now, and we just
can't recover from this situation.

Similarly for cpufreq_start_governor(), we call
cpufreq_update_current_freq(). I think we should move the check to
this routine instead.

IOW, we are using this cpufreq_suspended flag to return early in cases
where its not safe to try to access the hardware registers, as they
might be accessible via a device that has suspended now, like I2C or
SPI.

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-07 03:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-07 06:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 13:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-07 13:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 13:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-07 14:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-08 00:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 07:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-09 00:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 07:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-09 00:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-10 05:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Skip all governor-related actions for  cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-10 05:50 +0200
          [PATCH] cpufreq: Abort cpufreq_update_current_freq() for cpufreq_suspended set "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-04-10 06:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Abort cpufreq_update_current_freq() for  cpufreq_suspended set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-04-10 06:20 +0200

csiph-web