Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1372878

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event
Date 2016-04-06 23:50 +0200
Message-ID <rl3uN-1KQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <q6Y49-2nB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Ynw-2Kg-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl3l8-1Hl-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl3l8-1Hl-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl3l8-1Hl-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 04/06/2016 02:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/09/2015 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>

[cut]

>>
>> Well, nobody was using that event.
>>
>
> True, but that's more of a bug in drivers/thermal/cpu-cooling.c and
> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c. We should revert this patch and fix those
> drivers. Does that seem acceptable to you?

I'd rather see a patch series adding the event back along with some
users.  One user at least.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier  event Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-06 23:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE  notifier event "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-04-06 23:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier  event Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-07 00:00 +0200

csiph-web